MediaSpank: Where Journalism, Politics and Freelance Reality Meet
If you’ve ever wondered what happens when a journalist decides to pull back the curtain on the media industry itself, you’ll want to know about mediaspank. This isn’t your typical news aggregator or yet another hot-take factory. It’s something more interesting: a blog that examines how the media works, why politics gets covered the way it does, and what the freelance journalism life actually looks like when you strip away the romantic notions.
Born from a column in Crack, a Bristol-based arts and music magazine that’s since spread nationwide, MediaSpank has carved out its own space in the crowded world of media commentary. And unlike a lot of what you’ll find online, it doesn’t pretend to have all the answers.
What Makes MediaSpank Different
The media landscape is full of people shouting about bias, fake news, and whatever controversy happened five minutes ago. MediaSpank takes a different approach. It’s less about outrage and more about understanding. The focus is on the mechanics of journalism, the numbers that shape how stories get told, and the unglamorous reality of trying to make a living as a freelance writer.
Think of it as media criticism with its sleeves rolled up. There’s an honesty here that you don’t often find in discussions about journalism. Maybe that’s because the person behind it is actually in the trenches, dealing with the same rejection emails and invoice-chasing that every freelancer knows too well.
The Core Content Areas
The Numbers Behind the News
One of the most valuable things MediaSpank does is dig into the data. How many people actually read that viral story? What do the circulation figures really tell us about a publication’s influence? How are media companies actually making money (or not making money, as the case often is)?
This isn’t dry statistics for the sake of it. These numbers reveal how the industry works, why certain stories get covered, and why others don’t. When you understand the business model, you understand the news itself a bit better.
Journalists Worth Watching
There’s a section dedicated to journalists who are doing interesting work. Not celebrities, not the usual big names everyone already knows about. These are people who are actually moving the craft forward, trying new things, or just consistently doing excellent work that deserves attention.
It’s refreshing. Media criticism often focuses on what’s wrong. MediaSpank also makes space for what’s right.
On Freelancing
This might be the most brutally honest section. Subtitled “the letters of an unsuccessful journalist,” it doesn’t sugarcoat what freelance life is actually like. The pitches that go nowhere. The publications that fold. The endless hustle of trying to land the next gig while finishing the current one.
If you’re thinking about freelance journalism, or you’re already doing it and wondering if everyone else finds it this hard, this section will either discourage you completely or make you feel less alone. Probably both.
Why MediaSpank Matters in Today’s Media Environment
We’re living through a strange time for journalism. Traditional media is struggling. Digital media keeps having funding crises. Everyone’s got opinions about bias and trust and what journalism should be. But not many people are talking about the practical, nuts-and-bolts reality of how this industry actually functions.
That’s where mediaspank comes in. It’s not trying to solve journalism’s problems or declare what the future should look like. It’s documenting what’s happening, explaining why it’s happening, and occasionally pointing out when something is particularly absurd.
Understanding Media Literacy Through MediaSpank
Here’s something interesting: by breaking down how journalism works, MediaSpank actually helps readers become more media literate. When you understand the pressures that shape news coverage, you read everything differently.
| What You Learn | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| How publications make money | Helps explain editorial decisions and what gets covered |
| The reality of freelance rates | Context for understanding media quality and sustainability |
| How stories get commissioned | Insight into why certain topics dominate coverage |
| The difference between reported journalism and commentary | Better ability to evaluate what you’re reading |
You start seeing the incentives. You notice the patterns. You ask better questions about why a story is framed a certain way or why a particular angle got chosen. That’s valuable, regardless of your politics or which publications you prefer.
The Bristol Connection
MediaSpank has roots in Bristol, and that matters more than you might think. Bristol has a vibrant independent media scene, from magazines like Crack to various online publications and community radio stations. It’s a city that takes its arts and culture seriously, and that includes journalism.
The blog reflects some of that Bristol sensibility. It’s independent-minded, a bit irreverent, and not particularly interested in London-centric media navel-gazing. There’s a perspective here that comes from being slightly outside the mainstream media bubble, which often leads to sharper observations.
Topics You’ll Find on MediaSpank
The blog covers a range of subjects, but they generally fall into a few categories:
Media Analysis
- How newspapers are adapting to digital
- The economics of online journalism
- What circulation numbers actually mean
- The relationship between advertisers and editorial content
Political Coverage
- How political stories get shaped by media incentives
- The gap between political journalism and what voters actually care about
- Analysis of how different outlets cover the same events
- The role of political journalism in democratic accountability
The Freelance Experience
- Practical advice on pitching and getting commissioned
- Honest accounts of what doesn’t work
- The financial reality of freelance journalism
- Building a freelance career in a changing industry
Industry Observations
- Profiles of interesting journalists
- Commentary on media trends
- Analysis of what’s working and what isn’t
- The future of journalism (or lack thereof)
Who Should Read MediaSpank?
This blog isn’t for everyone. If you want simple answers about media bias or confirmation that your preferred outlet is the only trustworthy one, look elsewhere. MediaSpank is for people who can handle complexity and ambiguity.
It’s particularly useful for:
- Aspiring journalists who want to know what they’re getting into
- Current freelancers looking for solidarity and practical insights
- Media studies students who want perspective beyond their textbooks
- Readers who want to understand how journalism actually works
- Anyone interested in the intersection of media, politics and culture
The writing assumes you’re smart enough to follow along without everything being spelled out. That might sound obvious, but it’s rarer than it should be in online media commentary.
The Conversational Approach
One thing that makes MediaSpank readable is the tone. It’s professional without being stuffy. Informed without being academic. Critical without being cynical. The writer clearly cares about journalism even while being honest about its flaws.
There’s humor too, though it’s the dry kind rather than forced attempts at virality. The self-description alone (dancing like Kevin Bacon in Tremors, making love like a Motown record) tells you this isn’t taking itself too seriously while still taking the work seriously.
Getting Involved
If you’re interested in commissioning work, MediaSpank is open to pitches and projects. That’s actually worth knowing. Unlike many media commentary sites that are purely one-directional, there’s an opportunity here to engage with someone who’s actively working in the field.
Whether you need analysis of media trends, coverage of journalism issues, or commentary on political media, it’s worth reaching out. The perspective is distinctive enough to add value to publications looking for something beyond the usual takes.
Final Thoughts
MediaSpank occupies a useful niche in the media ecosystem. It’s not trying to be everything to everyone. Instead, it does a few things well: explaining how journalism actually works, being honest about the challenges of freelance life, and analyzing media and politics without falling into predictable partisan patterns.
In an era when media literacy matters more than ever, having voices that can explain the industry from the inside is valuable. MediaSpank does that with intelligence, humor, and a welcome lack of pretension.
If you care about how news gets made, why journalism is struggling, or what the freelance life actually looks like, it’s worth adding to your reading list. Just don’t expect easy answers or cheerleading. What you’ll get instead is honesty, analysis, and the perspective of someone who’s actually doing the work rather than just commenting from a distance.
And really, isn’t that what we should want from media commentary in the first place?